It’s tricky. How do you catch a ball no one has thrown yet? And how do you measure how well you’re catching the balls you can’t see?
Better yet, just what in the heck am I even talking about?
Managing your reputation online.
It’s one of the fears that executives at successful companies have about the internet – anyone can say anything about any person, place or thing on the web, and it can go completely unchallenged as long as it doesn’t rise to the level of libel (or slander in the case of video or audio.)
And that’s one way to look at it. But what’s missing is that search and social are the ultimate referees.
The assumption is that what ever information out there is
1- find-able,
2- usable,
3- relevant and
4- thought to be so by search engines and people using social media.
This assumption is fueled by the fact that is it technically correct sometimes. However, it isn’t always practically so.
Just because another company can say – or has said – something bad about you doesn’t mean that item is going to appear whenever your name is mentioned. If you know to look for a particular article by a specific name, then yes, that article would be much easier to find, assuming the people who published it know how to bring it to a search engine’s attention, or at least to the attention of someone who uses social media sites like Facebook or Twitter.
On the other hand, people may just be looking up your company name to make sure you aren’t running a scam, or to find positive reviews about you before they buy. If that’s the case, a lone article against you may not show up – IF the other hundreds of positive commentary is already at the top and well-supported.
What if it does? Well, there are defenses against that, but I’m writing about the offensive today, so we won’t wade too deeply into those waters now. (If you have an emergency, feel free to call me.) [click to continue...]
